🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. HDHP. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who comprehends this complex system? Not the typical business owner. Neither the average employee. Choosing the appropriate healthcare insurance for our business – or for households – seems like it requires advanced expertise in healthcare.

The Healthcare System Isn't Just Complicated, It's Costly

Based on recent research, typical households pays $twenty-seven thousand annually for their health insurance (up 6% compared to last year). Typical company healthcare expense is projected to surpass $seventeen thousand for each worker in 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Currently the government has ceased functioning due to partisan disputes over tax credits that experts say could cause premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program in the United States? I'm convinced we're approaching that point because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm proposing for our current Medicare system – an established insurance framework – merely extend to cover everyone. Our infrastructure remains intact. How our healthcare providers get paid would change. Believe me, they will adjust.

The Way Universal Coverage Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would require payments from both workers and companies. In similar programs, an employee earning average wages must contribute about five point three percent to their healthcare. Their employer pays about 13.75%.

Does this appear like a lot? Not if you compare that with what average American pays. I know multiple clients that are routinely paying anywhere from 8% to 15% of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that with comprehensive systems, those payments include retirement benefits, illness coverage, maternity leave and job loss protection along with supporting healthcare facilities. When you add those costs compared with what we pay on retirement programs, job loss coverage and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Implementation for America

For America, universal healthcare funding would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a framework that is already in place. It ought to be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. There would be both an employee and employer contribution. Similar to much of our government's military, technology, welfare services and infrastructure, the program could be managed to third-party administrators instead of federal agencies.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage would be a significant advantage for entrepreneurs like mine. It would place us on a level playing field against big corporations that can pay for superior coverage. It would render administration significantly simpler (a payroll deduction processed similarly to retirement and healthcare taxes, rather than separate payments to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would make simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than going through the complex (and fruitless) theater of negotiating with major insurers that we must do every year. Because it's simplified, there would exist improved comprehension of coverage by our employees – as opposed to existing arrangements which require them to interpret the complexities of current options. Additionally there would certainly be reduced responsibility for employers as we no longer have access to workers' health histories for risk assessment and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as possible. However I recognize that government has a significant role in our lives, including national security to funding needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone through a national insurance system strengthens economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for entrepreneurs which hire the majority of American employees and generate half the economic output. It enables employees to enjoy better health, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Are there a million considerations I'm not addressing? Of course there are. But with rising medical expenses we've seen recently, it's clear that current healthcare legislation is not working effectively. And I realize that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where big changes can be readily adopted. But expanding universal Medicare, despite increased taxation that would be incurred, would remain a superior and more affordable approach both for controlling healthcare costs but providing access to everyone.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, must reduce our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't so great. The US places well below numerous nations in healthcare quality globally, based on comprehensive research. Maybe one positive aspect amid current situation is that we take a hard look in the mirror and acknowledge that big changes are necessary.